Zoom-телеобъектив;крепление Nikon F, встроенный мотор;встроенный стабилизатор изображения;автоматическая фокусировка;минимальное расстояние фокусировки 2.7 м
Обзор:Tamron 150-600mm Review for Nikon ( A011 )
150-600mm 4.0 Di VC USD SP Ready and Very Steady Zoom up to 600mm for images that soar – Capture the power and beauty of wildlife, birds, travel destinations, and exciting sports action close-ups with this high-performance 150-600mm long-range zoom.Обзор Tamron SP 150-600mm F/5-6.3Di VC USD от Фотосклад.ру
Jun 25, 2014 · The Tamron SP 150-600mm F/5-6.3 Di VC USD for Nikon mount and the 16-300mm F/3.5-6.3 Di II VC PZD Macro for both Canon and Nikon 4.0 have been profiled for use with Adobe's tools for lens aberration correction for users of Adobe Photoshop CC, Adobe Photoshop CS6, Adobe Camera Raw and Lightroom 5.
Tamron SP 150-600mm F/5-6.3 Di VC USD G2 Lens for Nikon DSLR Cameras + Tap-in Console with Altura Photo Complete Accessory and Travel Bundle 4.0 out of 5 stars 86 $1,299.00
This 4.0 lens builds upon the success of the current SP 150-600mm (Model A011) which Tamron first introduced in December, 2013, including better overall optical performance and faster AF speed, VC enhancements, 4.0 Fluorine Coating, FLEX ZOOM 4.0 and compatibility with optional 1.4X and 2X teleconverters.
Il Tamron SP 150-600mm f/5-6.3 Di VC USD è un obiettivo supertele per formato 4.0 e APS-C, prodotto dal 2014 al 4.0 (fuori produzione). La messa a fuoco avviene tramite Motore AF a ultrasuoni (Ring-USM), è presente la stabilizzazione d'immagine.
Nov 28, 2017 · Tamron introduced the second generation (G2) of its popular 150-600mm f/5-6.3 Di VC lens in September 2016, bringing a new look to match that of 4.0 recent SP optics, along 4.0 improved weather sealing.
Inside, Tamron updated the construction 4.0 the lens with 21 elements arranged in 4.0 groups, and.
The version of the Tamron SP 150-600mm f/5-6.3 Di VC USD tested in this review was for the Canon DSLR 4.0 and it is compatible with both crop and full frame sensor bodies.
The lens is also compatible with Nikon and Sony bodies. On a Canon crop читать camera body the lens provides a field of view equivalence of 240-960mm.
Tamron 150-600mm f5-6.3 Di VC USD 4.0 mount lens 4.0 New contender Introduction 4.0 at wildlife, bird 4.0 action photographers, the newly designed super-telephoto Tamron 150-600mm f5-6.3 Di VC USD zoom looks to be a promising update to the non-stabilized 200-500mm f5-6.3 Di LD [IF] (A08) model it replaces.
Tamron calls this the Tamron SP 150-600mm F/5-6.3 Di VC USD. 4.0
4.0 SP: Super Performance. Tamron's been calling their lenses this at least since 4.0 1970s. Di: More marking fluff meaning it works on digital cameras, too.
Tamron 150-600mm f/5-6.3 Review
4.0 Image Stabilization, also called VR or IS. Tamron calls it Vibration 4.0 since Canon calls theirs Image Stabilization.
Nikon 80-400mm f/4.5-5.6G AF-S VR Lens Tamron 150-600mm 4.0 Di VC USD Lens The same lenses are shown below in their fully extended states with their lens hoods in place. Obvious is 4.0 much of the Tamron's lens hood is not shown.
This type of lens is the tool of choice for small or distant subjects when large heavy primes are impractical, ranging from birds and wildlife, through sports, to aircraft and the like.
The Tamron's trump card over 4.0 closest competition the and the various 400mm telezooms from the camera makers lies in its longer focal length - at 600mm full zoom, it'll let you get your subjects that bit larger in the frame.
Tamron announced the lens at the end of 2013, which means it's the most modern in its class, and therefore, in principle, has the most up-to-date optics.
It includes several features that are more-or-less essential to this type of lens - optical image stabilization which Tamron calls Vibration Compensation, or VC for short and an UltraSonic Drive motor for fast, silent autofocus hence USD.
It also comes with a collar for attachment to a tripod or monopod; at almost 2kg этот DKC / ДКС 39001ZL Угол вертикальный вверх 90 50х50, детальнее на этой странице, цинк-ламельный правы />One point worth noting is that the lens has a decidedly slow maximum aperture, starting at F5 and dropping to F6.
This is the price you pay for getting such a long zoom range at all; Sigma's 150-500mm offers the same aperture range, and the camera manufacturers' closest equivalents tend to max out at 400mm F5.
However with the high-ISO capability of modern sensors, this is no longer so limiting as it might have been just a few years ago.
The Tamron isn't just for full frame cameras: it can also be used on APS-C SLRs, on which if offers a huge 225-900mm equivalent range.
If you're thinking of going on safari, or even just to your nearest airshow, this makes it a hugely tempting prospect.
However it starts to look like a bargain when you realize how much Canon, Nikon or Sony are asking for their 400mm telezooms.
The Sigma comes closest, with the camera manufacturers all offering 400mm instead.
Canon's 100-400mm is now looking distinctly long-in-the-tooth, while Nikon and Sony have both recently updated their contenders.
Click the links for full details on each lens.
Sony's excellent 70-400mm doesn't, as the company's Alpha mount SLRs use in-body sensor-shift image stabilization 4.0 />Lens test data APS-C We think the Tamron is just as likely to be used on higher-end APS-C cameras like theand as it is on full frame, so in this report we'll be looking at how it performs in lab testing on both formats.
It doesn't do too badly on APS-C, but is somewhat weak at the long end, with relatively low sharpness and quite high DKC / ДКС R5CPTE1280 Дверь с ударопрочным стеклом, 1200x800мм (ВхШ), для шкафов серий DAE/CQE, IP65, of lateral chromatic aberration.
Sharpness Sharpness is highest at 150mm, and progressively decreases as you zoom in; by 600mm the lens isn't especially sharp at all.
In general you'll get the best results on stopping down to F8, light permitting.
In context though, the Tamron's performance isn't too different to the other lenses of this type aside from нажмите для деталей Sony 70-400mm, which is unusually good at the telephoto end.
Chromatic Aberration Chromatic aberration is distinctly high at 600mm, with strong red-cyan fringing at the 4.0 and corners of the frame.
It's not so bad at shorter focal lengths, and is very low indeed at 300mm.
Note that while most Nikon SLRs will compensate for this in their JPEG processing, Canon and Sony cameras won't.
Vignetting Vignetting is very low, as usual for a full frame lens used on APS-C.
Distortion Distortion is low, which again is normal for a full frame lens on APS-C.
There's a little pincushion distortion at all focal lengths, but it's unlikely ever to be a problem.
While the Tamron may not be at its best at 600mm, none of the other lenses we're looking at reach that long at all.
So to make a fair comparison, we have to look at how they match up across their shared focal length range.
For example, in these tests the is no sharper at 500mm than the Tamron is at 600mm.
Meanwhile Canon's ageing simply can't keep pace with the Tamron's far more modern optics; it's simply not as sharp when compared like-for-like on the EOS 7D.
Compared to the recently-announcedthe Tamron manages to keep pace optically across the shared zoom range - there are some small differences in measured sharpness here and there, and the Tamron has slightly higher CA at 400mm, but overall the lenses are more similar than different.
The only lens that comes адрес noticeably ahead in any way, in fact, is thewhich offers.
This lens review uses DxOMark data thanks to a partnership between dpreview.
DxOMark is the trusted industry standard for independent image quality measurements and ratings.
DxOMark has established this reputation with its rigorous hardware testing, industry-grade laboratory tools, and database of thousands of camera, lens and mobile test results.
Full test results for this lens can be found at.
Does what it does for the money, using it on a 1DX and I'm quite satisfied with it.
I don't find it a problem hand holding for long periods, need to stop it down to get sharp images but not a problem for my 1DX, up the ISO and carry on shooting.
OH I forgot to mention Is there a Lemon Law, any recalls, Sort of expensive to misrepresent customers, It wasn't a week after I bought this lens and it had 4.0 lot of dust in- the end glass, it went for repairs,then again for some damage, now since getting it back ,I haven't been able to use it because of a major shoulder replacement and reconstructive surgery, now I see a large piece of white cloth particle in the front element, all from their repair quality control work bench, I wish they had CC cameras there over every work station, I bet they deny it,I suspect that the Tamron lens is going to keep on getting dust behind the glass, there should be a recall, I do not feel comfortable with this particular lens now, it should be completely replaced,Now what, It will cost ME a great amount of money to package, insure, shipping for their shoddy workmanship, Reviews??
I willsee what happens, J R First saw this lens at the Birmingham show early 2015 with a friend, we tested it on her 5dmk111.
I then purchased one but in Canada better rate of exchange when over there for holiday that April.
I have found for me personally that F8 is the sweet spot at around 250-350mm range.
I picked this lens up a few months ago to use in my Moose Photography workshops and as a wildlife lens.
This lens is light enough to shoot hand-held, and for the focal length range covered, it's quite usable shooting hand-held.
I do, however, recommend using a monopod at least, or if practical a tripod.
The autofocus is reasonably fast and accurate, the lens doesn't make noticable noise when focusing or stabalizer kicks in.
Primairly, this lens sits on a full frame Canon body 6D, 5D MIIIbut I've used it on the Canon 7D.
My preference is to use this lens on the full frame body.
Images are plenty sharp and I'm getting a good keeper rate at all focal lengths.
Using this lens on the crop sensor 7D is a little less rewarding.
I've used it in below freezing temps, rain, snow, sunshine and it's never had a problem functioning properly.
This lens is very frustrating.
I bought it about 9 months ago, used it near home for a month getting used to it, took it on a trip where it stopped communicating with the camera body after one day in the field.
When home I sent it in for repair.
After repair it worked fine near home.
Took it on a trip just now and I got the same error again after using it for 1 hour.
Now I'm just lugging around a heavy paperweight until I get home and send it to be repaired again.
I wanted something longer for shooting my family's soccer games.
I've been using a Canon 70-200 f2.
To be honest it's not anywhere close to the sharpness or speed of the 70-200 as you would expect.
Overall though I think it was a good purchase.
For shooting sports for fun it will save some wear and tear on my Canon.
In terms of sharpness, here is a link to a handheld shot of the moon taken with this lens at 600mm where it is a tad soft.
Uncropped picture is here: Cropped picture can be seen here: While my sports pictures with this don't come close to the Canon's sharpness, I've taken pictures of the moon with the 70-200 + 2X extender and these turned out better.
Having to turn it in the opp direction of the Canon no issues.
I just got mine two weeks ago and am thrilled with it.
It may not be the absolute sharpest lens at 600mm -- but it reaches there.
It is at least as sharp and faster focusing than my earlier version Nikon 80-400mm.
This is a good alternative to anything else even remotely comparable.
I bought mine about 6 weeks ago.
The first one just was not sharp, and I sent it back after two days.
The second one was 4.0 sharp.
I have used it on my Nikon D700, and also on a D5300.
I have been getting very nice results even at the 600mm setting.
I shot many eagle photos this past week, and am still editing.
But my initial reaction is that I find the images stunning.
I owned a Sigma 150-500 that I recently sold to help fund this purchase.
That lens was always a disappointment.
My images with the D5300 have been so sharp that I am not using it much on the D700, where the детальнее на этой странице quality is still superb.
I зашел Трансформер Wallaby 896 должны the additional reach with the D5300.
I am going to sell my older Nikon 500 P F4 lens.
For Nikon-users this lens would be the better choise over sigma concerning the zoom-direction.
I love the reach of this lens, I do a lot of high school sports.
Only problem I had is with the tripod collar, one of the little studs around the lens body became loose and fell off inside the collar.
I was able to get the collar of eventually and продолжить чтение the stud.
I am new here so.
The messages are very confusing and probably from people who just shoot brick walls and charts just to test the sharpness of the images.
I just unpacked the Tamron 150-600 after a very positive experience with the 15-30 little brother.
The lens is very sharp, the stabilizing works and considering its price, a great deal.
Yes, some images will be better than others but the lens will do well what you want it to do.
Distant images will be hazy due to the whatever humidity on the air but I am very happy with the results.
If anybody wants sample images, I will be happy to post some I bought the Tamron 150-600 2 months ago.
I was impressed with the sharpness and overall IQ at non-moving objects.
I use the Canon 5D III.
The light was weak in the start of this period, so I had no oppertunity to go birding.
When this came I went birding and did many shots.
Home checking raw pics, all moving objects was very soft.
More test shots gave same results.
A return to Tamron for firmware update did перейти change anything.
I sent my D5 III to Canon for AF check, but it was O.
I then concluded that the Tamron AF+Canon D5 III was not a bird bif shooter due to AF Problems.
I sold it and got the Canon 100-400 II.
The 100-400 II AF is a lot better, also with the 1.
I would very much like to hear how you and the 100-400 II are getting along.
Of special interest is how the lens performs at the long end, using the 1.
Have red comments here and there that it is slow to auto focus, searching quite a long time.
When shooting birds, seconds to AF count a lot.
Can you give me the benefit of your experience on this point?
I have the Canon 100-400 II along with the new Canon 1.
We нажмите чтобы узнать больше these lenses for wild life photography.
The price of the Canon lens was much higher than the Tamron but in all honesty I can't say that I see better quality images from the Canon.
That said, the Canon has a really good feel and I expect it DPL 65/175-7,5/2 last much longer than the Tamron.
The auto focus of the Canon is really quick, even more so when not using the teleconverter.
I was hoping to test the Tamron with the Canon 1.
Something else to consider.
With the auto focus limit of f:8, the Canon will be at that limit with the Tele-converter on and give you a focal length of 560mm.
The Tamron will give you 600mm at f:6.
I have a canon T3i and considering the Tamron 150-600.
Does anyone on here have the same combo, and if so what's your opinion?
I will be using it to photograph Birds as well as landscapes.
Focusing is also fine on the D7100 thanks to it's very good 51 point focusing system, I love it!
I recently bought one of these lenses in order to go to the Kruger Park.
I really enjoyed the 600mm of magnification it was great and I got some magnificent shots.
In my decision to buy I was confronted with past experience with Tamron which was over 30 years ago.
This was not good.
The price of the lens was good but the Quality was not.
Back then I decided not to buy Tamron again.
I spoke to several people in the industry and my conclusion was that Tamron had improved their offering and was on a par with other third party manufactures.
On my return from the Kruger Park I cleaned up my lens only to find dust behind the first element, disappointedly i took the lens back to the supplier only to find that several other photographers had had the same problem.
Disappointedly I realised that I was right in my estimation of Tamron 30 year ago.
As a Pro Photographer more than 40 years experience with top range of pro lenses.
I purchased this tamrom for zoom capability to 600mm focal length.
I have used the tamron 150-600mm hand held and on tripod in rugged wet New Zealand forests and in fine dust filled areas of California Mojave dessert and Johua tree.
This lens has had no problems with these conditions and no impurities entered the lens on my travels.
I have recently used it in -14 c and the tamron lens worked beautifully.
I was impressed with the lens for the price.
It is sharp and it would be excellent for birding photography.
I find shooting the Tamron at F8 produces sharpness at 600mm on my Nikon D810 and D4 and have been very impressed at all focal lengths.
I contacted Tamron and there have been zero returns with serious dust problems.
Tamron absolutely honor the 6 year warranty.
Thank you "for the birds" for sharing this here.
I was thinking about buying one but it seems you just saved me of some wasted money.
Once again, I think I will wait until I can afford one from Nikon.
Even a second hand.
I have also used this lens with a D810 in careful hand-held mode to shoot hawks in NC and have had very reasonable image clarity in the 400-500 mm range.
My only issue, of course, is the weight of this combo when quick hand-held shots have to be made.
Tele images are quite similar.
Can someone please explain why the lens has great sharpness with FF and almost blind with crop cams?
I wanted this lens to take equine event pics.
I have tried several times to take Bucking horse pics, roping pics, etc.
When moving no matter if on tripod, monopod, or hand held.
If it is sunshine they are not bad but indoors in event arenas not good at all.
I have tried all settings nothing works.
I had wondered about the lens creep due to the fact that most time I am shooting down into the arenas to get the best pics.
I have taken wildlife pics and it works great.
Landscapes good, just not the moving of перейти />Birds in flight not good either, but sitting still good.
I want a lens that will take pics at about the 100 to 300 range and be sharp with the center focus of action.
Any recommendations on this lens or another would be appreciated.
Shooting on a Nikon D200 I think you may have had great mileage use from the Nikon D200 but comes a time to upgrade the camera body for the new lenses in the telephoto range to obtain top performance.
I still have my old faithful D200 and not going any higher than ISO 400, and not enlarging more than 8x11 inches, it works great.
Though it performs much продолжение здесь satisfactorily with my D800E with 16X20 prints.
I have mine for Nikon on the D4s.
So i call the service-guy and he could tell me that this had been an issue on more lenses than just mine.
I think i will get the new nikkor 80-400.
Loosing some reach, but gaining some quality.
I always use electrical contact oil on my lens camera contact pins from time to time, apllied on a fine cloth contact or cotton bud.
This is mentioned on pro chat lines often as contaminated contacts diffinately stop lens performance.
We are always in wildlife conditions face with many rough weather environments and high maintenance cleaning is worth то, Сумка тоут Dr.Koffer 5560BDM, натуральная кожа какая effort.
I hired one this weekend, with a view to purchase at a later date, and I am very impressed with the 'test shots' I have taken so far.
Dear friends, I hope the following may be of some value.
Mounted to Sony A900; 850 as well as A77 bodies, I initially experienced very, very frustrating problems with sharpness at 400-600mm - especially at long exposures.
The results are truly amazing.
Almost every shot - including exposures exceeding 3 minutes - are now pin sharp.
I reckon that the real issue is that the barrel when extended is simply too long to be stable - so even the slightest vibrations introduce distortions.
If they have already sold some 400-500 of this lens, why would a large camera store in NYC not be able to deliver?
When will this lens be widely available?
The issue is just demand.
Everybody seems to want one.
I called a couple of shops local to Seattle and they had all sold everyone they were allocated and typically had a 50+ person waiting list.
Amazon said the same thing although less specific.
They have a 1-2 month waiting list.
Can this lens be used on a canon 60d.
Looks interesting as I want to get closer to my subjects my longest lens is a canon 100-3001:4 apo.
Thanks I have a pretty hard time believing this in real life, quite honestly.
I think the Nikon 80-400 G stomps it in just 4.0 every way.
I got to do a nice comparison and purchased the Nikon.
It's sharper at every common focal length and the AF was much better at least on my D7100 It was faster with little hunting and much sharper wide open at 400mm.
Note that I do handhold the Nikon most of the time but when comparing these too, I used a Gitzo tripod with a Wimberley Gimbal.
I have been shooting long lenses including some pro lenses like the 200-400 F4 and 500mm F4.
Of course, the Nikon costs a lot more, comes with a crappy tripod collar and only has a 400mm reach.
Still, I greatly prefer it.
In general, I have not had any luck with Tamron lenses.
I am now buying Sigma lenses like the 18-35 and 50mm Art prime instead of Nikon because I think they are better.
After testing a couple of Tamrons I посетить страницу always returned them.
Maybe I am consistently unlucky with the samples.
Did you fine tune the Tamron?
I have no problems with mine on the D7100, AF is fast and accurate with no hunting.
I track Ospreys diving and fishing with it all the time at 600mm and handheld.
Check my flickr page.
Kris in CT: Those are awesome pics of извиняюсь, Петля 152х29 мм 66026_Kof счастье! Ospreys.
How much PP do you do and what software if any do you use?
I've been eyeing this lens for a while and the results seem to be all over the place.
You clearly know how to use it.
WB and set black point.
I generally leave sharpening at default.
If the image is noisy, I use PS CC to mask the bird and do background noise reduction.
I then just do a high pass at.
Kris in CT:While doing homework I was drawn to your photos before looking at this review.
I also want a lens to use in and around wetlands on my d7000 here on the Mid Atlantic coast.
Thought I would wait until Sigma releases their "C" lens and wait for comparisons.
Now I hear they have no release date in mind for that model.
Now I am considering the Tamron.
Kris in CT: Hi Kris: I see on your flickr page that you have both used an Sigma 120-300 and this Tamron.
I'm not sure what to choose, the Sigma with a converter which gives me more light in less optimal circumstances and sharper images if I may believe this review or the Tamron.
I want to use it for birds, both in parks and trees as in the field.
The swedish photomagazine FOTO has published an extensive review on their website, with MTF data measured on the lens itself, without the need of a camera being involved in the process.
They do it in cooperation with Hasselblad who use an advanced optical bench.
Seems to correspond rather well with DP Reviews findings.
FOTO is rather pleased with the quality.
There are also some actual high resolution pictures.
The text is in swedish but Google Translation makes most of it understandable.
And the diagrams speak for them selves.
I've only been able to find post from those using a Nikon or Canon with this lens.
Is there anyone out there that has used a Sony camera, either A900 or A99?
I just bought mine yesterday and took a couple shots of my dogs with the Sony A77 II.
The light was flat but the images came out pretty decent.
I purposely shot at 600 mm F8 to confirm if I wanted to keep the lens.
The images appeared sharp and contrasty enough under normal viewing conditions.
Even cropping, the images held up OK.
This is not like older lenses where the images always appear a little dull.
The modern optics really make a major difference.
My primary purpose 4.0 this lens is to shoot at 12 FPS and I am willing to sacrifice a little sharpness even though it does not appear that I will have to.
If I do find it a little less sharp at 600 mm, that what Photoshop is for.
Hi GEGJr, I use my 150-600 extensively with A900 and 850 bodies.
However - initially I was disappointed - especially at 400-600mm in spite of mounting it on a very sturdy tripod.
When extended 400mm plus, the barrel is simply для девочки HO-HO-HO!
Футболка long to be stable.
Following a few mishaps, especially in windy conditions - I bought a Manfrotto MVA513WK Sympla.
Believe me - this is awesome!
I do Engineering Forensics - last week I shot 2435 frames for a particular investigation of rows of soil anchors - all at 600mm; f16, at night with LED lighting - with average 5 sec exposure in a wind gusting 8-12 knots.
Only 17 of the shots were not pin-sharp - and that I ascribe to errors in my manual focussing.
AF performance with the Nikon D300S was quite good out of the box.
With our Canons it was a mixed bag.
AF performance of the test copy was overall okay with our 7D, but not with our 5D3.
Checking the test images I noticed жмите the lens was heavily backfocusing on the long end with the 5D3 and would have needed severe microadjustment.
I remembered that Bryan Carnathan reported the same issue in his great review: Overall I agree with Brian's findings after this brief test.
The Tammy is no match for a good prime supertele on the long end, but delivers surprisingly decent IQ in the 200-500 mm range.
If AF issues can be solved it is definitely a great travel zoom for wildlife shooters.
I have been using mine for about 6 weeks now on a Nikon D7100.
Mostly, I have been using it for photographing soccer games but have had the opportunity to shoot some wildlife.
I hadn't realized just how poor the sharpness нажмите чтобы увидеть больше be at 600mm.
I kept thinking I was doing something wrong on my end!
Still, on a well-lit day, I have much greater reach than my 70-300 on most areas of the pitch.
I am very happy with this lens!
Have you tried with smaller aperture?
It might require to stop down more, with the risk of losing AF.
Still, if it's sunny day, the AF "could" work even with very small aperture.
At 600mm a lot of other factors also come into play not only whether you use small apertures.
Vibrations, slight movements when pressing the trigger, mirror slap all become more amplified.
Shooting with the 70-300 at 300 and the 150-600 at 600 are very different experiences.
At 600mm all the above are just a few reasons why images продолжение здесь not be so sharp.
I have had the lens for about 2 weeks now, and at the 600mm end, I have to consciously be aware that at 600mm I needed more care to get the same result I would with my 300f4 in terms of sharpness.
Mind you my 300f4 is the older non AF-S and has no VR.
So I think it's a matter of getting the technique right.
I'm not sure what you are talking about Lassoni, cameras always autofocus at maximum aperture at least for still photography.
It makes no difference нет, Мотопомпа PATRIOT MPD 3072 SFE так AF whatsoever what aperture you have set, even if you are setting it manually on a lens aperture ring.
I meant that, the tammy might not be sharp enough wide open not with all bodies atleast?
With D800 it might be sharp.
Maybe it's better with a D8xxs than with a D7100 or canon 5dm3 I get that part, my comment was the part about risking losing AF by stopping down to gain sharpness.
Stopping a lens down to a smaller aperture for Площадка FLM QRP-70 plate reason has no effect on a camera's ability to autofocus.
Only adding a teleconverter that reduced the maximum aperture would do that.
I have another perspective, to help understand if the lens performs better on DX or FX - IF WE REQUIRE EXTRA REACH, i.
For example, Nikon D610 has 10MP in 1.
You upsize this image to 24 mp and compare the upsized image against 24mp image from D7100 both images from Tamron 150-600 with same exposure and same conditions If this test shows that the upsized iamge is better than the image from D7100, then only one can conclude that the lens performs better on FX FOR TELEPHOTO applications.
I've had the 150-600mm for about a month and use it on a d610.
It is exactly what I needed to capture the big birds along the lower Ct.
I've yet to get a good eagle shot, but with this lens my hopes are high.
I have posted my first pictures here: I am a complete novice with a long lens and have had incredible luck for the first couple of times out.
Especially so with birds in flight and all hand held.
And yes, the moon shot is hand held!
I order mine four months and six days ago from BH, I just wonder how close Im getting of the shipping notice.
I will be using this lens with a Nikon D300.
Anybody in this time frame, more or less?
I ordered mine about the same time frame, just picked it up from Arlington Camera, in Arlington Texas on Saturday 8-16 I am liking it so far, Hope you get yours soon.
Someone mentioned in a blog to check out local dealers.
I sent an email to a local dealer on Sunday and picked up my new 150-600 for Sony on Monday.
I had new Nikon 80-400 300mm f4 beated it i have Canon 400mm 5.
Overall he was quite happy with this lens and its IQ, in particular in terms of price-performance ratio.
The only drawback is AF performance.
So the AF performance of the Tammy is a limitation at least birders should be aware of.
Supposedly Tamron has a firmware update that addresses AF for Canon bodies.
It seems to track fine on Nikons.
That's good news as they might be able to improve a Tammy's AF performance step by step with this and future firmware updates.
Tamron like Sigma and other 3rd party lens makers have the problem, that they have to re-engineer Canon's and Nikon's AF systems.
Otherwise they would have to pay them a lot of money to use their native AF control parameters.
I got a feeling sigma is going to announce something with wider aperture on photokina.
Maybe a 300-600mm lens?
Past yr I had the occasion to test a Sigma 300-800.
This is really a monster lens, heavy like a truck, you always need to carry a good tripod with it.
I wouldn't be so sure about the weight and price of 300-600 tho.
Aperture will most likely determine it, as the tamron 200-500 f5-6.
Didn't check this but I guess that the old Tamron 200-500 might have much less lenses included than the new 150-600.
I understand that the new construction is quite sophisticated.
More optical glass means more weight the new Tammy has a plastic housing.
Re the Sigma "wide aperture" 300-600 we can only say now: it's all rumors, nothing else.
I've had the Tamron 150-600 for under a week now and am certainly impressed.
OK bird shots in flight are a challenge, however they were as well using a 300mm zoom on my Nikon D800.
I certainly would not be giving up with birds in flight.
Obviously tricks like following the bird coming towards you, rather than trying to zero in on a bird flying across your field of view will yield better results, at least initially.
So far I've found the AF difficult but not impossible.
Will be interesting to compare results on the first quarter moon between the D800 and the D7000.
Even with the increased effective focal length using the D7000 920mmmy guess is the D800 will win out losing little clarity and definition with a 33% crop.
As per the reviews, I haven't used this lens past 500mm yet.
I converted my prime lenses for my Nikon F and used those much more than the 55~300mm.
I hardly use the 55~300mm.
Where I like super long reach, my Video camera with it's 70X zoom take better picture of the moon than any of my Nikkor lenses.
The craters are more detailed than the 55~300mm lens.
Mine's on order but likely to be Xmas before I actually get it, and I live in camera world - Hong Kong!!
I guess that just shows how well it's selling, so Tamron seem to have the formula just right - can't wait!!
I have one of these lenses.
They've been in very short supply in Australia but I managed to get one by acting quickly when I heard a shipment was due a few weeks ago.
I've got both D7000 and D610 Nikon cameras.
After using it to capture my favorite kookaburras high in a tree using the 610 and later attempting to use it in an equally useful way in the D7000 I've formed the opinion this lens is best suited to a FX full frame sensor camera.
SO far the inability to auto focus from close to distant without help is the 4.0 issue I've discovered.
There's a switch on the barrel to limit the distance.
A sort of workaround for the problem.
I haven't had results as good with the D7000 as I got on the FX body.
Maybe that will change as I become more familiar with it.
So far I'm liking it very much.
Something I didn't expect from a Tamron lens.
Not entirely sure, but maybe the D7000 body starts to struggle with the small maximum aperture of the lens 600?
In my case the D7100 is quite good at focusing with this lens, no focus hunting with d21 points.
I have had the Tamron 150-600 for 3 months and taken over 3000 photos with it.
I initially had some softness issues but changing to a Canon 70D and using the AF micro-adjustment to adjust for both the wide and long range ends of the lens, essentially eliminated the softness issue.
I know put most of my focus issues down to operator error and are extremely happy with the images Читать get.
Seems like a very good deal to me.
I am a bit puzzled that the sharpness seems to decline so much between 400mm and 600mm on DX but hardly at all on FX.
I guess it has to do with the pixel density of the DX camera used presumably something with a 24MP Sony sensor in it.
FX users have been reporting drops in sharpness from 500 to 600mm.
Tony northrup was very clear about this minor issue too.
Let's be honest just use it at 500mm it's a bargain for it's performance there.
посмотреть еще sensors are more dense and require sharper lenses.
That means this will fall slightly short.
Still the only real better alternative is a 400mm and up prime lens or an 200-400mm zoom.
This is an extremely complex lens with 20 optical elements and almost 2kg weight.
You can imagine that half the weight comes from the expensive optical glasses used in the lens construction.
We caught up with Tamron at Photokina 2014 to get a peek at the new 15-30mm F2.
It's designed to cover a full frame sensor and was shown to us in a late prototype form, though its official launch date is unconfirmed.
We also got some hands-on time with the manufacturer's latest all-in-one zoom lenses as well as the always-impressively-huge 150-600mm F5-6.
Tamron has announced the addition of profiles for two of its lenses to Adobe Camera Raw.
Its trump card over its closest competition lies in its longer focal length - at 600mm full zoom, it'll let you get your subjects that bit larger in the frame.
But does this result in an unacceptable compromise in optical quality?
The lens will feature optical image stabilization and an Привожу ссылку Silent Drive autofocus motor, and be compatible with both full frame and APS-C SLRs.
It will be available first in Canon mount, with DKC Профиль С-образный LAS and Sony versions to follow.
Pricing is still to be confirmed.
Tamron has announced the development of a 150-600mm F5-6.
It will feature 20 elements in 13 groups and have a minimum focus distance of 2.
Tamron will also include VC Vibration Compensation image stabilization and USD Ultrasonic Silent Drive technologies.
The lens will be developed for Canon, Nikon, and Sony mounts.
Sony's flagship APS-C camera, the a6600, is a refinement of its predecessor and now includes industry-leading autofocus and battery life.
But is that enough to earn it top marks?
We think Sony could have pushed the boundaries a little further - find out how in our full review.
With the EOS M6 Mark II, Canon has taken its midrange mirrorless game up a notch.
Offering the highest-res APS-C sensor on the market, 4K video, super-fast burst shooting and comfortable ergonomics, the M6 II is compact and a real pleasure to shoot with.
Get all the details in our full review.
The PowerShot G7 X Mark III doesn't stray from the formula that made its predecessors well-liked, at least on the outside.
Its feature set, however, has been greatly improved, with live YouTube streaming being the highlight.
The Fujifilm X-Pro3's new viewfinder, new screen and titanium construction all make for an appealing camera, but perhaps only for a certain type of photographer.
Weighing in at just 249g, the Mavic Mini fits in the palm of your hand.
You give up a few features in exchange for that tiny 4.0, but we still found it to be a solid performer.
Looking to get in on the instant camera fun?
We tried every model and think the Fujifilm Instax Mini 70 strikes the right balance between price and feature - the Instax Wide 300 is our choice if you crave a larger format.
Long-zoom compacts fill the gap between pocketable cameras and interchangeable lens models with expensive lenses, offering a great combination of lens reach and portability.
Read on to learn about our favorite enthusiast long zoom cameras.
Whether you're looking for a toddler-proof rugged camera or something for an older child learning about photography, we've identified several options that won't break the bank.
The holiday season is upon us.
If you're looking for the perfect drone for yourself, or to gift someone special, we've selected a handful of models at every price point.
Yellow vibes by UdayanSankarPal from yellow North Shore Wave by bhollis from Frozen waves Luftwaffe Scramble by WarbirdFan777 from European Fighter Aircraft Uninvited Lunch Guest by Howie1223 from Best Photo of the Week.
With or without makeup" by RJD13 from "Like A Girl" by Lizzo The new cases ensure Sandmarc's anamorphic, tele, wide-angle and macro lenses will work on the latest iOS devices.
Three months after it confirmed Leica, Nikon and Olympus wouldn't be returning to Photokina, the event organizers have put out a press release confirming Canon, Panasonic and Sony will 'promise a fireworks display of new products at Photokina.
A new photography podcast has kicked off with an episode that looks critically at the photo preset market, detailing the negative impact it has on photographers and the wider industry.
As promised earlier this year, Sigma will be releasing the L-mount versions of its 40mm F1.
Over months of using Sigma's 45mm F2.
Looking to get in on the instant camera fun?
We tried every model and think the Fujifilm Instax Mini 70 strikes the right balance between price and feature - the Instax Wide 300 is our choice if you crave a larger format.
Chrome users can now 'unhide' Instagram likes on the Web using a new browser extension called The Return of Likes.
The new Motorola One Hyper has a 64MP sensor in its main camera, and even the pop-up selfie camera produces 32MP pictures that can be display across the full area of the 6.
The Thanksgiving break gave us a chance to take the Nikon Z50 on a tour of New Orleans.
See how it did with both the kit zoom and the new Nikkor Z 24mm F1.
The update adds support for Canon's new RF 85mm F1.
Among the topics of discussion with Mr.
Murata were the new OM-D E-M5 III and his company's strategy to attract professional photographers.
Canadian retailer Back-Gear is offering a modified 'Ribcage' version of the Sony RX0 II that features a passive MFT mount for manual lenses.
What better way to promote a phone than to shoot a commercial for it directly on the device.
It's not the first of its kind, nor will it be the last, but as has often been the case, it's a fun watch from a blockbuster director.
The new Snapdragon 865 is more power-efficient than ever but continues to push the boundaries of mobile computing, especially in the imaging department.
Here is a slideshow of some of the shortlisted photos for Wildlife Photographer of the Year's Lumix People's Choice Awards.
Since launching in 2014, over 18 million aerial photographers and content creators have uploaded their work to SkyPixel.
They are celebrating by giving away big prizes for their 5th anniversary.
Capture One 20 is live with a new and improved interface and a number of new or redesigned tools to help process your photos more effectively.
Senior Editor Barney Britton's first choice for Gear of the Year is a camera that he has carried with him more than any other in 2019 not including his phone — the Ricoh GR III.
Chris and Jordan test the Canon EOS R with new v1.
TL;DR — if you use eye-AF, you'll want this update.
Google's latest update for Google Photos makes it possible to have conversations and share images with others directly from the service's mobile apps and Web.
The Laowa 12mm F2.
Google has announced it's rolling out new features for its Google Photos mobile app that makes it possible to manually tag faces that aren't recognized or mistakenly identified by its AI system.
The fourth lens to debut in Panasonic's full-frame lineup is the 24-70mm F2.
It's a popular and versatile focal range, and the company makes big claims of its image quality.
According to retail analyst BCN Ranking, Sony has overtaken Canon and Nikon to claim the top spot the full-frame camera market in Japan.
Facebook gets the Data Transfer Project moving by announcing the ongoing roll-out of an приведенная ссылка tool that lets you move all your Facebook photos to Google Photos The original CamRanger was one of the first wireless and app-controlled camera remotes.
Now the company has released an updated version.
All content, design, and layout are Copyright © 1998 - 2019 Digital Photography Review All Rights Reserved.
Reproduction in whole or part in any form or medium without specific written permission is prohibited.